Thursday, May 16, 2013

Why Catholics Call Priests "Father"

Much of what follows is taken from material I have posted on this subject in the past. I am posting it anew for two reasons: 1) this is always an important issue to address, as it does cause concern among non-Catholic Christians, and 2) this very issue was raised with me on at least two separate occasions recently - it is thus fresh on my mind and deserves my attention. As a bonus, I had already planned on re-posting my blog series on the "male-only priesthood," and this current post presents a nice lead-in to that topic.


+        +        +

Non-Catholic Christians often object to the Catholics using the term "Father" as a title for priests. The primary reason: the Bible forbids it! That seems like a very good reason, and one that Catholics ought to heed...that is, if it were actually true. However, as with many criticisms concerning Catholic practices and teachings, this common misunderstanding stems from a poor interpretation of Scripture. Here is the passage in question:
“But you are not to be called 'Rabbi' [Master], for you have only one Master and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. Nor are you to be called 'teacher,' for you have one Teacher, the Christ. The greatest among you will be your servant. For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” (Matthew 23:8-11) [Emphasis added]
The verse we are most concerned with here is in bold in the quote above. Protestants insist that Jesus meant these words literally. When He said to call no one on earth "father," that meant that you should call absolutely no one on earth "father" – – end of story. Thus Jesus instituted an outright ban on the use of this title among Christians. If this is true, then Catholics are obviously in disobedience to Jesus’ clear scriptural command.

A few problems arise from this literalist interpretation, which becomes clear when we consider the larger context of our verse. If Jesus truly meant to ban outright the use of the title "father," then He also forbade anyone to be called “teacher” (vs. 10, above): "Nor are you to be called 'teacher,' for you have one Teacher, the Christ." If we take these verses literally, then Jesus breaks his own command just a few verses later by calling someone other than the Christ “teacher.” In Matthew 23:13 He says,  "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees…” Indeed Jesus never avoided the word “teacher” after seemingly banning the word here. He uses it freely as a title for people other than Himself. Nor does the average Protestant avoid using the word "teacher." How many Christians – the very ones who criticize Catholics for calling their priests “Father” - call their Sunday school instructors “teacher”? This would violate Jesus’ command every bit as much as Catholics calling their priests “Father.”

Furthermore, notice in verse 8 at the beginning of our passage from Matthew above: Jesus forbids the use of the word “master” (a form of which is “Rabbi”). But we all use a form of the word “master” whenever we say Mister or Misses (words that are derived from the same word as "Master"). So do we violate a direct command from Jesus anytime we attach the word “master” to our own names? If Catholics are unbiblical then so are Mr. Protestant and Mrs. Evangelical.

Surely there must be some other way to interpret this text. Jesus must not have meant to ban the word “teacher” since He Himself used it immediately after saying not to do so. He would not have made such a strict rule only to break it in His very next breath. And how can Protestants criticize Catholics for using the term "father" when clearly Protestants use "teacher" and "master" themselves.

So what about the word "Father"? Are there any biblical examples of this title being used? The answer is a resounding, yes:

Paul calls himself a “father” in the same spiritual sense that Catholics use the term: “For if you were to have countless tutors [also rendered “teachers” – notice Paul uses this forbidden term too] in Christ, yet you would not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father [‘I have begotten you’] through the gospel.” (1Corinthians 4:15) Paul often called those who were under his spiritual care his “children” implying his spiritual fatherhood.

In Acts, as Stephen is about to be martyred he calls the Jewish leaders “fathers”: “Hear me, brethren and fathers!” (Acts 7:2)

Also in Acts, we find a reference to “our father David” (Acts 4:25). Not all Jews were directly descended from David; nonetheless the title “father” is applied to David because of his spiritual fatherhood rather than a direct biological connection.

Jesus calls Abraham “father”: “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” (John 8:56) Often the Patriarchs (which is from the Latin for father – “pater”) of the Old Testament were referred to as “fathers” because of their great importance in the Jewish faith. Hebrews 1:1 does this as well: “God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways…”

Shockingly, Jesus even calls the devil a “father”: "You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth.” (John 8:44)

And of course, apart from the Bible, we cannot neglect to mention our everyday usage of the term. We all call our own male parent “father” and we use terms like “father of the country” or “founding fathers” for our secular heroes.

So why is it that Catholics are singled out, when clearly the Biblical and historical evidence shows that this passage from Matthew was never meant to be taken literally? Or more to the point, why did Jesus speak in such stark terms if He did not mean exactly what He said? How are we to interpret this passage from Matthew?

In Matthew 23:8-11, Jesus is using a rhetorical device called hyperbole – which means to exaggerate in an extreme way in order to make a point. We do this when we say things like, “I had to wait forever in line…” or “I’ve done this a million times…” No one takes you literally when you say these things, because everyone knows that you are overstating the truth in order to make a point. You are speaking in hyperbole.

So Jesus did not mean to forbid the use of certain words. Rather He intended to emphasize that our earthly experience of teachers and masters and fathers pales in comparison to the Teacher/Master/Father that is God.

Thus regarding teachers, Jesus’ point is this: Christ is the Ultimate Teacher. He is THE Teacher - above all other teachers. Just as Jesus is the most perfect of all human beings and deserves to be called Son of Man more than any of us do, so too does He deserve the name Teacher more than any earthly teacher does. Likewise, the word “Father” describes God as the Ultimate Father above all others. Anything we experience of fatherhood here on earth (even our own biological father) is an imperfect reflection of the divine paternity of God. The two are miles apart. And the same can be said of masters.

The reason Jesus is stressing this difference is not to ban these words from usage. The real reason is found in the final lines of our passage above: “The greatest among you will be your servant. For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” Jesus is telling us to avoid puffing ourselves up with pride concerning titles and official names. We may be father, master, or teacher to our fellow Christians, but these titles bear with them a humble acceptance of servitude, not a grand air of superiority. Catholics call their priests “Father” because as priests they accept the role of service and self-giving that is a reflection of God’s own gift of Self as Father to us all.

No comments:

Post a Comment